<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pharma's Cutting Edge</title>
	
	<link>http://www.pharmaweblog.com</link>
	<description>Pharmaceutical and biotech science and business</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://blog.crownstoneinsights.com/atom.xml" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on Revisiting premarketing risk evaluations by FDA finally admits need for large safety studies premarketing | Pharma's Cutting Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmaweblog.com/2007/05/21/revisiting-premarketing-risk-evaluations/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>FDA finally admits need for large safety studies premarketing | Pharma's Cutting Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaweblog.com/blog/2007/05/21/revisiting-premarketing-risk-evaluations/#comment-203</guid>
		
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] independent adjudication) of fatal and serious, nonfatal adverse events.  See my prior posts, here and here for arguments I have proffered to support this [...]<br/>
<br/>
This is a content summary only. Visit my blog at http://www.pharmaweblog.com for full content, links and more!<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=kBPEN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=kBPEN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=hc2yN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=hc2yN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=iSvTn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=iSvTn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=nGFqN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=nGFqN" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acomplia to be pulled in EU by CB1 antagonist update, and a poor excuse | Pharma's Cutting Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmaweblog.com/2008/10/23/acomplia-to-be-pulled-in-eu/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>CB1 antagonist update, and a poor excuse | Pharma's Cutting Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmaweblog.com/?p=580#comment-200</guid>
		
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] recently reported on Sanofi-Aventis’ decision to pull rimonabant from EU shelves.  Since then, S-A has [...]<br/>
<br/>
This is a content summary only. Visit my blog at http://www.pharmaweblog.com for full content, links and more!<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=6QiKN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=6QiKN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=fw4YN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=fw4YN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=NrlZn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=NrlZn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=KbWKN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=KbWKN" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lilly to Massachusetts legislators: your new code stinks by Off-base on off-label promotion | Pharma's Cutting Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmaweblog.com/2008/09/23/lilly-to-massachusetts-legislators-your-new-code-stinks/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Off-base on off-label promotion | Pharma's Cutting Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmaweblog.com/?p=512#comment-198</guid>
		
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] off-label uses among Medicaid patients that’s fine too.  But if they’re smart (Mass. apparently isn’t) they will keep the red-tape to a minimum, because for every dime pharma spends helping the [...]<br/>
<br/>
This is a content summary only. Visit my blog at http://www.pharmaweblog.com for full content, links and more!<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=QqLvM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=QqLvM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=ZSjcM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=ZSjcM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=9wSEm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=9wSEm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?a=ebyAM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/PharmasCuttingEdgeComments?i=ebyAM" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
<feedburner:awareness>http://api.feedburner.com/awareness/1.0/GetFeedData?uri=PharmasCuttingEdgeComments</feedburner:awareness></channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.267 seconds -->
